Good point, Ellie. It’s a trade-off, isn't it? Boost local employment at the potential cost of international diversity and expertise. Wonder how this will play out in the long run. 🤨
While more foreign investment is beneficial, we need to consider the potential for exploitation. Companies might game the system to meet Saudization targets without genuinely contributing to local employment.
Responding to Max, it's true that evidence from past initiatives can guide us, but each situation is unique. This program might be just what's needed given the current socio-economic landscape. They just need to ensure that it doesn't exclude those who might just have missed the cut-off due to...
haha, good one! But seriously, the priority processing for rural projects is a significant advantage, especially for investors from countries with high applicant volumes like India and China. 📈
It's a great initiative, but as Leonard mentioned, the devil is in the details. Effective communication and clear guidelines are essential for this to work smoothly.
Exactly, Sarah! And with SEO Amsterdam Economics conducting the review, I believe the outcome will provide a balanced view that considers both the economic impact and the personal experiences of the expats.
I’m all for streamlined processes, but what about the practical challenges? Implementing such a major overhaul will surely come with significant hurdles. 😬
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.