Disagree with the idea of too much regulation. Isn’t the whole appeal of gig work the lack of traditional constraints? Introducing too many rules or mandatory benefits could dilute the essence of what makes gig work attractive to many.
NOT convinced this won’t slow down the work permit process. 🤨 More bureaucracy usually means more waiting. They say it won’t affect processing times, but let’s see how it actually plays out. I'm skeptical.
I DISAGREE with the notion that this program is all sunshine and rainbows. The financial burden it places on participants cannot be understated. Not everyone can afford the initial expenses of travel and accommodation, making this opportunity less accessible to a significant portion of potential...
Completely DISAGREE with the need for additional documentation like audited financials. It’s just another hoop to jump through, and for what? To make it harder for companies to bring in the talent they need?
However, the notion that this system simplifies talent retention is a bit misleading. The complexity and cost can actually inhibit access to the UK job market for many international graduates.
Disagree with you. The complexity is a significant barrier. It's not just about having options; it's about making them accessible. Countries need to simplify these processes.
Disagreeing here, but isn't the onus on employers to ensure they're following the law, regardless of the guidance's specificity? We can't expect the government to hand-hold every business through the process. It's about due diligence and taking the initiative to understand and apply the...
Disagree with the positive spin here. What about the smaller companies who relied on the old system to have a fighting chance against tech giants? They could submit multiple applications to increase their odds. Now, it seems like we're handing even more power to the big players who have better...
DISAGREE with the overwhelming positivity here. The program’s limited eligibility and the lack of an expedite option are major flaws. It seems like a half-baked solution that doesn't fully consider the diverse needs of H-1B visa holders. Why introduce a program that benefits so few and still...
I DISAGREE with the notion that just planning ahead solves everything. What about emergencies or unforeseen circumstances? This situation can put people in difficult positions, highlighting a need for more flexible solutions during these periods.
I see where you're coming from, but I think you're missing a key point. The program, despite its limitations, has made a significant impact by placing thousands of IMGs in rural and underserved areas. Yes, there's a shortage, but blaming the program for legislative inaction seems unfair. It's...
I DISAGREE with the notion that we just have to wait and see. There should be more pressure on the authorities to expedite the resolution. It's unacceptable for such a critical system to be down for this long. Employers and foreign nationals should not have to bear the brunt of these failures.
Disagreeing here. This move might streamline the process for some, but it also puts a lot of dreams on hold. Prioritizing certain occupations over others could lead to missed opportunities for the province in terms of innovation and cultural diversity. There's a fine line between strategic...
I disagree with most of you here. The income requirement is a necessary evil. Without it, companies could exploit workers, paying them less than what’s fair. It’s a good move by Denmark, even if it means some small businesses will struggle. They’ll just have to adapt or find local talent.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.